Quantcast
Sunday, April 20, 2014

Residents organize one more time against Elysian Park reservoir cover up*

The DWP  has said in the past that building a roof over the Elysian and Upper Stone Canyon reservoirs would save between $150 million to $190 million over the cost of building underground storage tanks (click here for more details). In April 2010, the DWP commissioners were scheduled to vote on approving a cover over the Elysian Park reservoir but postponed their decision.

The DWP needs to cover or replace the Elysian Reservoir by 2015 to comply with new water quality standards. Lassen said the Citizens Committee has been working the DWP to identify the necessary funds for the underground tanks. The DWP has asked state water quality officials for more time to find funds but have been turned down, Lassen said.

Lassen and others note that the DWP has spent large amounts of money to build underground tanks to replace other reservoirs. It is currently building tanks that will eventually replace the Silver Lake reservoirs.

In 2001, the agency replaced the Rowena Reservoir in Los Feliz with a 10 million gallon tank topped by a decorative pond and landscaping after faced with opposition to building a roof over the facility.

Update: The Elysian Reservoir cover has been removed from the Dec. 6 agenda and maybe rescheduled until January, said Lassen.

Related stories & links:

  • Elysian Reservoir Water Quality Improvement Project. DWP
  • Open water’s open question. LA Times
  • A dry spell for Elysian Park’s reservoir. The Eastsider

 

13 comments

  1. Toxic drinking water

  2. From what I’ve read a cover will cost around 100 million less than burying tanks, plus there would be significantly less construction required. I’ve ridden my bike up to that Resivior, it’s not a beautiful natural feature, it’s a giant concrete hole in the ground surrounded by a chain link fence.

  3. Rowena reservoir in Silver Lake used to be a giant concrete hole in the ground surrounded by chainlink. Now it’s an underground tank topped by beautifully landscaped grounds surrounded by an even stronger fence and residents who are damn happy it’s completely off-limits to the public.

    At the Elysian reservoir there’s an opportunity to beautify and better that section of the park FOR the public. I’m not writing the checks so I should probably STFU, but the purported $100 million in savings that will come from its further uglyification by covering it in a giant rubber blanket isn’t money well saved.

  4. If you’re a dwp customer you are writing checks for this. Im worried about water rates, dwp says they dont have the money for it that means we’re all going to have to pay for this with higher rates. I guess the question I ask then is a grassy area the size of a football field worth 100 million? How “beautiful” do we expect this area to really be? You can’t plant trees over it they could turn it into a sports field or a playground, but Elysian park already has these types of facilities.

  5. I just wanted to add that I’m not against beautifying the park, it’s the price tag that I don’t agree with. If the city had the money and they could do this without raising rates and complying with federal regulation, I’d support it, but they can’t.

  6. Is the chemical content of the rubber top a legitimate concern? Baking in the sun and possibly leaching things into the water underneath? That’s what I would like to know….

    This comes from someone who avoids water from plastic water bottles as much as possible.

  7. Because of the potential for terrorist or biological attacks, federal laws (passed in 2011) require that all open air reservoirs be covered. The Silver Lake/Ivanhoe reservoirs will be replaced by the Headworks Project, a new subterranean reservoir near the northwestern edge of Griffith Park. The cost according to DWP is well over $100M and will result in fee hikes – which DWP is asking for now but can’t receive due to the wait on a hiring a ratepayer advocate.

    As far as Elysian Park’s reservoir, I speculate that the blowback from the request for rate hikes (associated with the Headworks Project) and the unreasonable financial strain caused by converting open air reservoirs is forcing them to rethink less expensive alternatives.

    The real question is once Headworks is on-line in 2017, what will happen to the Silver Lake/Ivanhoe reservoirs?

  8. I believe dwp has stated they’re turning the land over to rec and parks

  9. @ El batmanuel – Sweet. I’ll supply the popcorn and we can watch the Eastsider forums fill up with bickering over what’s more important to provide parkland for – kids or dogs. ;)

  10. @Will Campbell: I really wish the city would open the Rowena reservoir to the public. It’s such a shame to have that beautiful public space (which I assume our taxes made possible) fenced off from the neighborhood. Maybe the mayor can incorporate it into his plan to open more pocket parks.

  11. I lived by the Rowena reservoir for 6 years, and always wanted to go into that park! I remember clearly the first time I went for a jog in my new neighborhood, I think I must have gone around it three times looking for a way in, because I just couldn’t believe that there would be this lovely little park that you couldn’t use! What a waste!

  12. @ Cristi: DWP might not have enough money to build Headworks so a cover might be in the future for Ivanhoe(would be the second cover for it). The plain fact is DWP income is going down every year due to less water usage.

    Rowena will probably never be opened to the public due to liability issues.

  13. Manhattan’s diversity is reflected in its various sub-neighborhoods. Here, you can get a flavor of the unique living experience each has to offer from Little Italy to Hudson Heights, including subway, bus & school information.

Post a Comment

Please keep your comments civil and on topic and refrain from personal attacks. The moderator reserves the right to edit or delete any comments. The Eastsider's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy apply to comments submitted by readers. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>