Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Echo Park dog owner loses pet to phony animal cruelty officers

Dog stolen in scam | LAPD

Dog stolen in scam | LAPD

Echo Park News Sponsor
Masa of Echo Park

ECHO PARK —  Police are warning area pet owners of a scam being operated by two women who were able to steal one dog by posing as officers with the LAPD’s Animal Cruelty Task Force.

The owner of a dog in the 1000 block of Waterloo Street  lost the pet last week as a result of the scam, according to an alert distributed by the Rampart Division. The suspects are described as an approximately 35-year-old female Latina and an approximately 35-year-old white female. Both women are about 5-feet high and weigh about 130 to 140 pounds.

Lt. Wes Buhrmester with the Rampart Division explained how the Echo Park dog owner lost his pet:

The two suspects told the victim there were multiple neighborhood complaints of the dog being unfed and not being given water.  They were there to seize the dog and check it for abuse or neglect.  The suspects then presented an actual [LAPD Animal Cruel Task Force ] flyer as substantiation.  The victim surrendered the dog to them, and he has not seen it or the suspects.

Buhrmester said police are trying to find out if other pet owners have fallen victim to the same scam.

Anyone with information about the suspects are asked to contact Rampart Division burglary detectives at (213) 484-3490.

Eastsider Advertising


  1. an “actual flyer”? who hands over their dog after being shown a flyer? how about asking to see a badge?

  2. So Sad.

    Hopefully this can educate other people!

    Animal Control offices CAN NOT seize your animal without a judge-issued warrant. ONLY the LAPD or sheriff has to power and serve that warrant to you.

    Animal Control offices can issue a formal notice to you. That notice is paperwork that states any infractions (lack of water, underfed animal, poor animal living conditions).

    That notice can be issued in person, or left on your door.

    Those Animal Control offices then have to formally follow up with you in a given amount of time. If the issue has not improved in two weeks (or whatever time they give), then they can start paperwork to seize the animal. Again, that seizure of property can ONLY happen with a judge-issued warrant that is served by LAPD/Law Enforcement.

  3. TheSquiggleySpooch

    What do you think their motivation is? I feel sick for the people who fell for it, my puppies are my babies I would be devastated!

  4. Rout them out and give them the chair.

  5. Is it possible these are a couple girls in the neighborhood that thought this pet owner really wasn’t taking good care of her pet and cooked up this scheme to rescue the pet? Maybe the “victim” felt guilty and thought she could avoid punishment for handing over the animal?

    I have a dog and if someone would try this with me I’d have a good laugh while the door was closing in their faces because I KNOW it’s totally false. I take great care of my dog and it’s pretty evident. Do we have an account of the health of the dog from someone other than the dog’s owner/family? I mean, I know people who have tried this scheme to rescue children from abusive parents. Makes me wonder why she would just hand her pooch over like that. Any input on this LT? It just doesn’t add up to me. Someone offered up the motivation as $. This is a cute dog but doesn’t strike me as a dog someone would pay major bucks for. Just not adding up on waterloo…

  6. @elboomerator My thoughts exactly. What do these women get out of taking this dog? Sounds more like a rescue attempt. Something doesn’t add up.

  7. It should have been suspect from the get go, as the city doesn’t actually give a s–t about animal cruelty. Period.
    Sadly been watching my neighbor abuse their dogs for years. I called the LAPD (not our department call Animal Services) called Animal Services (not our department call Animal Cruelty) called Animal Cruelty (we can’t do anything call Humane Society), called Humane Society (we can’t do anything call LAPD). Called LAPD again was told that I needed to write an actual physical letter (no email, no phoning) and that they would try to send someone in a few weeks to inspect.
    Maybe I should call these women instead. At least SOMETHING will get done.

    • Leopold! OMG you got the “report abuse runnaround”!chain of do nothing EXACTLY CORRECT!! You sir are so On Point! LAPD despite Wes’s statements could not care less about animal abuse and 15years of animal rescue and dealing with the system tells me so. Two puppies were stolen from UNLEASHED pet store on sunset a year ago. There was VIDEO. I had 3network news ready to blast the story. LAPD WOULD NOT RELEASE THE VIDEO!! No video. No story. No search for the puppies who were taken by gang type teens in a car with Florida plates. So that is just one of many many examples I can share. The boo hoo man in echo park. Wow what is the FACTS of this case? Was the dog licensed? Microchipped? That’s a start for legal ownership and compliance with our municipal codes. Funny but it doesn’t mention if dog was spayed and licensed. Anyway it’s almost touching that the “stealers” picked ACTF to impersonate!! LOL. Like they care!! They are cops just like the rest of LAPD. most likely a neighbor who knows more than the cops who (sorry Wes) I bet did not ask around the hood–found a way to help the dog. People who steal dogs for money steal PUPPIES. They rarely take full grown dogs. There are about 60 look alike Maltopoo like that at the city POUND. everyone who thinks this story seems “off” or unusual– you are the 1percent who don’t fall for media hype or press releases. Leopold I am going to print out your runaround chain. It’s just exactly what they say. But since Wes is invited you to send him the abused dog info (if dog still there/alive) by all means do so and please post the results.!! Good luck. It’s like calling Time Warner

    • I think it’s odd that the dog was still around. If these women wanted to steal the dog it would be long gone and would not be getting a wellness exam. No no, something is very wrong with this whole story. When the truth comes out I have no doubt it WILL be known that this was an abused dog and that AC did not step up to do a proper job and animal control WAS called about this dog. Though the scheme was elaborate animal rescuers will sometimes go to great lengths to save an abused animal. Anyone who has dealt with AC or the police know the authorities can’t always do much and sometimes won’t do much. It’s all a great publicity stunt that is going to backfire. If Cesar Aguilar loved his dog so much why did he turn it over?! He could have called a neighbor or his landlord before handing her over. He knows how to work the press doesn’t he? Yes he must have known he had done something wrong….Stay tuned for thhe real story…

  8. I’d love it if they tried that scam on me and my dogs…..the outcome would definitely be VERY different.


  10. I am so worried that the dog in the craigslist posting is the dog that was stolen.
    And the craigslist posting is still active 🙁

    what can we do ?????

    i’m so worried that the dog on craigslist will be sold and then this woman will never get her dog back !!!!

    i’ve emailed Wes again today and haven’t heard back yet…………

  11. The first thing I noted, other than the resemblance, was that the ad refers to the dog as “he” and the owner whose dog was stolen refers to the dog as “she”. There’s something about the ad that just seems phony. I hope someone is checking the ads regularly.

    • where in this article does it say ANYTHING about the sex of the dog that was stolen…i’ve re-read it 100 times. What am i missing here?

  12. It does not matter the sex of the puppy . It was stolen !

  13. Mario, if you had read all of the comments, then you would know that the conversation about the gender of the stolen dog is in regards to the craigslist posting of a dog for sale that looks EXACTLY like the stolen dog!

  14. The dogs name is Frannie…you figure out the gender…duh!

Post a Comment

Please keep your comments civil and on topic and refrain from personal attacks. The moderator reserves the right to edit or delete any comments. The Eastsider's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy apply to comments submitted by readers. Required fields are marked *