Thursday, October 27, 2016

Estimate of L.A. River restoration soars to $1.6 billion

Rendering of river restoration | Army Corps of Engineers

Rendering of river restoration | Army Corps of Engineers

Two years ago officials unveiled a $1 billion plan to restore and revitalize an 11-mile stretch of the L.A River from Griffith Park to Downtown, with the cost split 50-50 between the city and the Federal government. But those estimates have proven to be far off the mark. A new study released by city financial analysts now pegs the estimated cost at $1.6 billion, reports the L.A. Times. The city’s share of the cost has also risen to about 76%.

The most recent example of the high cost of restoring the river is the purchase and cleanup a 41-acre, riverside parcel on the border of Cypress Park and Glassell Park. The city has allocated $40 million to purchase what’s been called the “crown jewel” of river properties from from Union Pacific railroad. The property, known as Parcel G2,  sit on a bend in the river next to Rio de Los Angeles State Park.

But the $40-million purchase price is only a relatively small portion of the project cost.  When the expenses of cleaning up contaminated soil and other items are taken into account, the estimated cost of the project jumps to $252 million, according the 91-page report issued by City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana and Chief Legislative Analyst Sharon Tso.

Mayor Eric Garcetti and some City Council members remain supporters of the river revitalization despite the soaring cost estimates. Councilman Gil Cedillo told the Times:

“This is a long-term project that is not going to happen overnight …. We must take it step by step, and first and foremost is securing the land.”

Eastsider Advertising


  1. How about using the money to house the homeless?

  2. do whatever you got to do as long as it’s nice, and dont do anything unless it’s nice. just saying.

  3. This is money well spent! Can’t wait to see the transformation! Finally!! Wooohooo! Keep it natural. No hideous public art pieces. A tree is a way more beautiful sculpture:)

  4. Now if only we could keep the Santa Monica Mtn Conservancy and Northeast Trees away from the project we might end up with something nice.

  5. Wasting money to restore the river before helping the families being pushed out. Dumb…..

  6. I cannot wait for his to start!

    you can care about housing homeless and creating a green space, the two are not mutually exclusive.

Post a Comment

Please keep your comments civil and on topic and refrain from personal attacks. The moderator reserves the right to edit or delete any comments. The Eastsider's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy apply to comments submitted by readers. Required fields are marked *